North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: advise on network security report

  • From: Roland Dobbins
  • Date: Mon Oct 30 12:24:26 2006
  • Authentication-results:; [email protected]; dkim=pass (sig from verified; );
  • Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=930; t=1162228895; x=1163092895;c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim1002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version;; [email protected]; z=From:Roland=20Dobbins=20<[email protected]>|Subject:Re=3A=20advise=20on=20network=20security=20report;; b=A8QH5LN6WqrRaA5a4x4i2ZNVv503eD/1B8kHYKMckwfAJxyoYKXDH03SSThjSRWDIktTGxkWDqtOIOfiyv4khxJWatjRm7QIAgSSa+Yguz2h/2XXK8diPEt1BNovomu/;

On Oct 30, 2006, at 8:53 AM, Rick Wesson wrote:

I'm expecting to post a weekly report once a month to nanog, would this be disruptive?
Far better to simply post a pointer to your new list, IMHO, and let folks subscribe if the so choose. As it is, many of these various automated postings to NANOG are mildly annoying to those who aren't interested or who already receive the information in another form.

Whatever service you end up offering, a a full-text RSS or Atom feed would probably be useful, as well.

Roland Dobbins <[email protected]> // 408.527.6376 voice

Any information security mechanism, process, or procedure which can
be consistently defeated by the successful application of a single
class of attacks must be considered fatally flawed.

-- The Lucy Van Pelt Principle of Secure Systems Design