North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Best practices inquiry: filtering 128/1

  • From: Patrick W. Gilmore
  • Date: Mon Jul 10 22:49:32 2006

On Jul 10, 2006, at 10:18 PM, [email protected] wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 22:00:11 EDT, "Patrick W. Gilmore" said:

On Jul 10, 2006, at 9:48 PM, WONG, Yuen-Fung wrote:

Sometimes earlier this year someone announced this 128/1 and caused
heavy loading to our routers to rebuild the CEF.
Would anyone filter out this route (and other similar routes such
as 0/1, 128/1, 0/2, 64/2, .... up to /4, for example) as bogus routes?

Would anyone not filter those routes? Why wouldn't you filter to /7? 

Every growing season, a new crop of network engineers falls fresh from
the tree, and must be picked up, polished, and clue imparted on the
way to market.....

Well, then don't snip the most important clue in the post:

Actually, I take that back. Why wouldn't you just get a feed from Cymru <http://www.cymru.com/Bogons/index.html> ??

:-)

--
TTFN,
patrick