North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: Shim6 vs PI addressing
- From: Andy Davidson
- Date: Mon Mar 06 03:12:27 2006
Roland Dobbins wrote:
On Mar 3, 2006, at 10:50 AM, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
We've been here before; we shift a lot of data in the content arena, and
our web-head loadbalancers, installed only a year ago, don't even
support ipv6 in the current software build.
> OTOH, hosts go a lot longer between upgrades and generally don't have
> professional admins. It'll be a long, long time (if ever) until shim6
> is deployed widely enough for folks to literally bet their company on
> host-based multihoming.
This issue alone means that shim6 isn't viable. Besides the already-
mentioned security and complexity issues, enterprise IT departments -
i.e., the customers who need multihoming and cannot live without it -
are not going to be amused when told that the tens and hundreds of
thousands of desktops, laptops, PDAs, and other IP-enabled devices on
their networks are now essentially routers, with multiple IP addresses
and complex middleware required to simply access 'the Internet' . . .