|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Modelling a large ISP network with C-BGP
> Cc: [email protected] > From: Christian Kuhtz <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Modelling a large ISP network with C-BGP > Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 17:19:50 -0500 > To: Gregory Hicks <ghicks> > > > On Feb 2, 2006, at 5:02 PM, Gregory Hicks wrote: > > > > >> From: Christian Kuhtz <[email protected]> > >> Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 15:38:57 -0500 > >> > >> On Feb 2, 2006, at 3:34 PM, Alain Hebert wrote: > >>> > >>> I fail to see a usage for smaller ISP that are using BGP only > >>> for peering and OSPF internaly. > >> > >> Why would you need to sim this at small scale? > > > > How about for a net that has 540+ networks? It would be > > interesting to see what happens if you perturb this BEFORE you do > > the perturbation... > > *sigh* > > You just made me speechless. All I can come with is "Well, DUH!" Christian: Honestly, I didn't *mean* to make you speechless! It just happened... What I *meant* to write was ... 540+ SUBnets. We have several /16 addresses and some 35K hosts right now - but still growing... All this is hiding behind one AS... (used to be three ASes) > > *sigh* > ------------------------------------------------------------------- I am perfectly capable of learning from my mistakes. I will surely learn a great deal today. "A democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding on what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the results of the decision." - Benjamin Franklin "The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they be properly armed." --Alexander Hamilton
|