North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: IPv6 news

  • Date: Wed Oct 12 19:43:08 2005

I don't think so ... I recall Geoff Huston in the last APNIC indicated that
this kind of actions are only going to provide a few additional time.

I think the BoF should be more in the direction of "why not doing already
IPv6 (from the perspective of the ISPs) ?".

Delaying the inevitable don't seems the best approach to me, instead,
preparing everything ahead of time, reduce the cost, which in any case is
not significant.


> De: Daniel Golding <[email protected]>
> Responder a: <[email protected]>
> Fecha: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 15:20:31 -0400
> Para: Randy Bush <[email protected]>, "Steven M. Bellovin" <[email protected]>
> CC: <[email protected]>
> Conversaciļæ½n: IPv6 news
> Asunto: Re: IPv6 news
> On 10/12/05 3:13 PM, "Randy Bush" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> geoff's predictions for a very lively market in v4 space will
>> seriously come into play.
> Maybe its time to have a serious talk about IPv4 commodity trading schemes.
> Anyone interested in this enough to have a BOF at ARIN/NANOG?
> This could extend the lifetime of the IPv4 space significantly by promoting
> efficient use through economic incentives, provide positive economic
> incentives to move to v6 when needed, and eliminate the grey market.
> Proper controls could be put into place to prevent de-aggregation through
> utilization of the RIRs as clearing houses.
>> randy

The IPv6 Portal:

Barcelona 2005 Global IPv6 Summit
Information available at:

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.