|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: a call for peace (Re: SMTP AUTH)
i quoted somebody as saying: > >> :0 > >> * ^From:.*<[email protected]\.com > >> /dev/null and was told by an actual procmail user the following: > That regex needs some work (the left-angle bracket excludes messages sent > with a bare address), and: > > > it does no good for me to filter out the crackpots if the rest of > > you are just going to keep on replying to same. > > if you can rely on at least some people to group-reply to mailing > lists as nature intended (which you didn't do, which is why I know > about this thread), then > > > :0 > > * (^From|To|Cc):.*[email protected]\.(com|net) > > /dev/null > > does a better job. The following does very nicely for me, for the > record :-) > > > # Valley of the Kooks > > > > :0 > > * ^(From|To|Cc):.*[email protected](pccf\.net|dot-god\.com) > > /dev/null > > > > :0 > > * ^(From|To|Cc):.*[email protected]\.netcom\.com > > /dev/null > > > > :0 > > * > > ^(From|To|Cc):.*(jimfleming|jfleming)@(prodigy\.net|anet\.com|ameritech\.net) > > /dev/null > > > > :0 > > * (^From|To|Cc):.*[email protected]\.(com|net) > > /dev/null it's all klingon to me, but that's what i heard.
|