North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Anycast reliability (was: Re: verizon.net and other email grief)
On 13 Dec 2004, at 15:27, Steve Gibbard wrote: Distribution of a service (whether by anycast or by some other means) is bound to introduce complexity over that incurred by a single instance of a service running in just one place. In some cases, the cost of that complexity is offset by reduced costs (or risk) elsewhere, and anycast makes sense.On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Simon Waters wrote:Inspection suggests that the anycast announcements in the UK were(for anybody reading this who doesn't know, anycast is multiple servers in For a discussion of some of the issues surrounding service distribution using anycast, see: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kurtis-anycast-bcp-00.txt Flames and projectiles relating to that draft would be very gratefully received (either directly or on the GROW list, but probably not on NANOG). Joe
|