North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]
On 22-nov-04, at 21:42, [email protected] wrote: that network topology and geography don't On the other hand, unless you have some way to *enforce* a higher correlationThere is no enforcing as such. All the gory details are in http://www.muada.com/drafts/draft-van-beijnum-multi6-isp-int-aggr -01.txt For instance, 212.x.y.z is "known" to be on one continent, and so on - butWell, suppose we know 212/8 is used in Europe. A network that is present in say, North America and Europe then has the routers in Europe that talk to the routers in America filter out all 212/8 more specifics and only announce the aggregate instead. In the simple version this only works if there is full interconnection for all 212/8 destination in Europe. In the more complex version there is selective deaggregation for some destinations to overcome lack of local peering.
|