|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: [nanog] RE: Stupid Ipv6 question...
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004, Scott Morris wrote: No, nobody ever reads that tag. It says "not to be removed except by the consumer". Which with at least one severly drunk friend of mine, has meant that if you remove it, you have to eat it :) -Dan Does that mean if we rip them off that we may be prosecuted? ;) Scott -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kevin Loch Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 1:41 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Stupid Ipv6 question... Leo Bicknell wrote:With the exception of auto-configuration, I have yet to see any IPv6 gear that cares about prefix length. Configuring a /1 to a /128 seems to work just fine. If anyone knows of gear imposing narrower limits on what can be configured I'd be facinated to know about them.64 bit prefixes are the mattress tags of IPv6 interfaces. -- Kevin Loch -- "We need another cat. This one's retarded." -Cali, March 8, 2003 (3:43 AM) --------Dan Mahoney-------- Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM Site: http://www.gushi.org ---------------------------
|