North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: Stupid Ipv6 question...

  • From: Scott Morris
  • Date: Fri Nov 19 14:09:10 2004

Does that mean if we rip them off that we may be prosecuted?

;)

Scott 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Kevin Loch
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 1:41 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Stupid Ipv6 question...


Leo Bicknell wrote:

> With the exception of auto-configuration, I have yet to see any
> IPv6 gear that cares about prefix length.  Configuring a /1 to a
> /128 seems to work just fine.  If anyone knows of gear imposing 
> narrower limits on what can be configured I'd be facinated to know 
> about them.
> 

64 bit prefixes are the mattress tags of IPv6 interfaces.

--
Kevin Loch