North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 09:18:22 EST, Christian Kuhtz said: > So, again, somebody says they're selling it.. And without wanting to sound > like a flame.. what volume of native, non-tunnel IPv6 traffic do you see and > what applications is it? Could you throw those of us a bone who are still > scratching our heads as to what business cases support this? ;) The point is that Randy was wrong when he said there weren't any v6 ISPs in 2002, because at least some were doing it a year before that. For *THAT* matter, I've heard a lot of people over on the main IETF list in the last week or so stating that SMTP is only 1-2% of many places' total bandwidth usage. So why don't we all just cut *THAT* off because there's no business case to support *THAT* either? :) Attachment:
pgp00043.pgp
|