North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]

  • From: Christian Kuhtz
  • Date: Thu Nov 18 09:19:49 2004

On 11/18/04 5:44 AM, "Mike Leber" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Nov 2004, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> in august 2002 there were no v6 isp's.
>> 
>> you're kidding, right?  let's not be too americocentric.
>> i assure you there were.  i think even c&w might have been
>> deploying in the states then.
> 
> Heh, when I saw his assertion I figured a statement as wrong as that
> wasn't worth correcting.  (my bad)
> 
> Since you chimed up I thought I'd go and check our press releases for when
> we got around to announcing we were selling IPv6 connections and I found
> something dated May 9th, 2001.  At that time we already were offering
> native (as opposed to our free IPv6 tunnel service) IPv6 connections at
> several locations in the US.

So, again, somebody says they're selling it.. And without wanting to sound
like a flame.. what volume of native, non-tunnel IPv6 traffic do you see and
what applications is it?  Could you throw those of us a bone who are still
scratching our heads as to what business cases support this? ;)

Thanks,
Christian



The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary, and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers. 117