|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: [OT] Good Anti-Spam Boilerplate
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Charles Sprickman wrote: > After some senseless Googling, I'm at a loss. I'm looking for a very > comprehensive, up-to-date example of an AUP that covers spam. When I say > "modern", I mean that I want it to include not just direct spamming, but > abuse of remote open-relays, abuse of remote trojaned boxes, sending > through a third party that circumvents the local AUP, etc. Some good > definition of "requested email" would be great - ie: double opt-in, or > single opt-in with some documentation that the user requested the mail on > a web form or similar. > > Some language that covers penalties would also be helpful, such as > equipment seizure for non-payment of penalties. > > Please reply privately and I'll summarize. I do not wish to get into any > debates about what qualifies as spam on this list. Replying to myself here... Thanks to everyone. I'd missed the spamhaus "spam definition" which will be very helpful in wording a few things. And the prize for "best TOS" goes to Steve Sobol from "justthe.net". This one is great: http://justthe.net/legal/tos/ I especially like the pdf generator. :) Now I'll have to see what the lawyer thinks. Thanks again everyone, Charles > Thanks, > > Charles > > -- > Charles Sprickman > [email protected] >
|