North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: [OnTopic] common list sense (Re: Even you can be hacked)

  • From: Paul Jakma
  • Date: Fri Jun 11 13:22:06 2004 
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Randy Bush wrote:


reply-to: headers are bad.
Oh, on that I agree.

There are draft RFCs to specify these things better, eg seperating the concept of 'Reply-to' into one policy for list related replies and another for personal, mutt supports these drafts already[1], but there hasnt been much apparent movement in these drafts becoming standards track. (primarily because there are already similar headers defined and RFC standards tracked for NNTP readers/posters).

1. which can be annoying when dealing with mutt users.

regards,
--
Paul Jakma [email protected] [email protected] Key ID: 64A2FF6A
warning: do not ever send email to [email protected]
Fortune:
The soul would have no rainbow had the eyes no tears.