North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 orother vendor ?

  • From: Alexander Hagen
  • Date: Sun Apr 25 09:11:14 2004

It is a great box. But I need BGP. I notice Cisco does not support 7505
with Software Advisor but does 7507 whats the deal with that ?

Alexander Hagen
Etheric Networks Incorporated, A California Corporation
527 Sixth Street No 371261
Montara CA 94037
Main Line: (650)-728-3375
Direct Line: (650) 728-3086
Cell: (650) 740-0650 (Does not work at our office in Montara)
Home: (Emgcy or weekends) 650-728-5820
fax: (650) 240-1750
http://www.etheric.net

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2004 6:04 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200
orother vendor ?

> Yes. I've been looking at it and a 7505 with a 3550 behind it seems
the
> way to go for our type of operation. 
> 
> As a cost cutting alternative - has anyone played with the 2900 XL
> series using sub interfaces to turn them into virtual router ports ?
or
> vlan groups ?
> Is it better to just buy a 3550 ?

If you're only doing basic Ethernet-Ethernet routing, and don't need
a full routing table, it's quite possible that the 3550 will perform
better than either the 6000/Sup1A or the 7505. You might also consider
a 3750, which handles a large number of SVIs better than the 3550.

(Yes, I'm seriously suggesting using the 3550 or 3750 alone.)

Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, [email protected]