|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: Open, anonymous services and dealing with abuse
Well they accept mail at [email protected] but they certainly don't do anything about it. I have sent numerous complaints to that address with absolutely nothing happening to fix the problem. The address is a black hole. Roy -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Mark Turpin Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 9:56 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Open, anonymous services and dealing with abuse On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Daniel Reed wrote: > paid regularly, or their budgets are kept low, etc. Many will have RFC 2142 > contacts, but appear to discard incoming mail. Some, such as Charter > Communications, do not even have these mandatory addresses (mail is not > accepted for <[email protected]>). while they do not conform to the RFC, they receive accept mail at/for [email protected] [This would be the domain w/o outsourced MX...] > And on the other hand, it is the CDC that would perform an outbreak > isolation, not the restaurant staff. You're talking about a concerted effort. So far, I haven't seen the levels of cooperation between providers that is required. I'm all for everyone holding hands and squashing out issues. But until you get past the isolationist mindset (you must be sick of me saying that by now) good luck... I think we're both in agreement that until * starts saying "If I don't stop this today, it will hurt me tomorrow", that the cooperation required to address and stop these issues will be nil. -mark
|