North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Sabotage investigation of fiber cuts in Northwest
On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 10:07, Owen DeLong wrote: > Maybe I'm missing something, but, if you have the bolt cutters, I don't > see why you need the key to an adjacent lock or any of the locks. If you want to reconnect the chain back together without replacing the lock, you'll need a key from an adjacent lock so you can lock the lock on the left back on the lock to the right, or vice versa. > Additionally, most of these things are in remote enough locations that > you are unlikely to be observed using the bolt cutters to gain access > to the site. It's not like the requirement for a set of bolt cutters > is a high barrier to entry for a thug that wants into the site. Agreed, of course, to a determined criminal, even doors and locks won't keep him out. But at bare minimum they could at least TRY to have some semblance of security. Actually locking things would be a start. > John is right about American Towers. They use the same combination at > ALL of their sites and their security company will happily tell anyone > that they think should have access what the "standard" combination is. haha. Sounds like a nice, high security operation. -Paul
|