North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: ix's & prefix registration
> On Tuesday, October 14, 2003 6:28 PM, joshua sahala > <[email protected]> wrote: >> i was wondering if there were some published docs online regarding the >> registration of route objects and membership at an ix - specifically, >> do ixp's around the world require that their members register all of >> their route objects prior to being allowed to exchange traffic at the >> ix? * [email protected] (Nipper, Arnold) [Tue 14 Oct 2003, 18:51 CEST]: > DE-CIX (http://www.de-cix.net) does (see 4.4 > http://www.de-cix.net/info/DE-CIX_technical_requirements.pdf). And > afaik that's also true for LINX, AMS-IX, Xchangepoint, ... Look at > their policies as well. AMS-IX does not, nor does it require its members to peer with anybody (including the exchange-supporting network infrastructure). AMS-IX believes that the decision to peer is up to the individual members. -- Niels.
|