|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: ix's & prefix registration
DE-CIX (http://www.de-cix.net) does (see 4.4 http://www.de-cix.net/info/DE-CIX_technical_requirements.pdf). And afaik that's also true for LINX, AMS-IX, Xchangepoint, ... Look at their policies as well. DE-CIX does not monitor this. However if you are using DE-CIX's routeserver your announcements are filtered against your policy (as path lists and ip filter lists). Regards, Arnold On Tuesday, October 14, 2003 6:28 PM, joshua sahala <[email protected]> wrote: > hello to all > > i was wondering if there were some published docs online regarding the > registration of route objects and membership at an ix - specifically, > do ixp's around the world require that their members register all of > their route objects prior to being allowed to exchange traffic at the > ix? if so, how do you/they monitor this? is it left up to the other > providers at the ix to verify that they are peering with someone who > registers their objects? is this something that an ix could/should > worry about? > i know that many providers around the world are increasingly requiring > registration, and that many build their filters from these registrations, > but i have been unable to find anything wrt internet exchanges. > > replies on or off, i will summarize > > thanks > > /joshua > > > "Walk with me through the Universe, > And along the way see how all of us are Connected. > Feast the eyes of your Soul, > On the Love that abounds. > In all places at once, seemingly endless, > Like your own existence." > - Stephen Hawking -
|