North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: News coverage, Verisign etc.
"Verisign Highjacks Internet" That should work :-) On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Mike Tancsa wrote: > > At 03:06 PM 08/10/2003, [email protected] wrote: > > > >In these days of corporate malfeasance scandal coverage, you'd think that > >Verisign's tactics would have whetted the appetite of some bright > >investigative reporter for one of the major publications. > > Too difficult and obscure a topic to make interesting. Its even worse than > the S&L scandal of the 80s. Things like ice statues pissing vodka at > private million dollar parties are easy to cover in that a picture says it > all.... There is no easy way to convey this issue to the general public in > just a few words and at the same time not put them to sleep.... > > ---Mike > > > >On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote: > > > > > > > > I have gotten a reasoned response from the technology editor of the > > > Washington Post, and we are discussing things. While I wouldn't have > > > done it that way, he had a rational explanation of why the story was > > > written the way it was, and definitely indicating there will be > > > continuing coverage of the issue. He believes there's always room > > > for improving coverage. > > > > > > >James Smallacombe PlantageNet, Inc. CEO and Janitor > >[email protected] http://3.am > >========================================================================= >
|