|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: Kill Verisign Routes :: A Dynamic BGP solution
Which is fine with me/my client base. Since what they are doing is essentially a MITM attack, the client base I serve and I would rather have the mail sit in OUR spools for a couple of days, vs. bouncing immediately with the potential of the mail addresses being harvested. Also, from the perspective of our "sensitive clients", they would like mistyped URL's with parameters to be errored out on the browser side, vs being dumped to a Verisign server with the parameters (potentially usernames/passwords, etc) possibly ending up in their logs. Also, whats to keep Verisign from changing the behavior of their mail spool? Right now, its questionable how it rejects. It would make a neat project to make a server that accepted the whole message, and THEN bounced it after it was all spooled/logged. Verisign do something like that? Nahhh, not our beloved Verisign .... Eric > -----Original Message----- > From: Stephen J. Wilcox [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 6:51 PM > To: Eric Germann > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Kill Verisign Routes :: A Dynamic BGP solution > > <snip> > So totallymadeupdomain.com now resolves but is unreachable. That > will prevent > you from bouncing emails to non-existent domains immediately.. > > Steve > >
|