North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Spam thread
On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 03:27:39PM -0500, Jack Bates wrote: > > Susan Harris wrote: > > >Can we please stop the spam thread ("Open relays and open proxies") and > >take it to a more appropriate list: > > > I agree that it's a more appropriate list. Yet I do wonder if the > discussion (at least in part), and particularly the original thread > before the various sub-threads on SC and blacklisting started is not > appropriate for nanog. Feel free to move the discussion over to a seperate list, I've had an inet-ops list for some time on my system and the topic of proxies that are available for abuse are important for the operator community as a whole to deal with as they can be used for numerous bad things. http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/inet-ops > > In particular, I feel issues with proxies, trojans, etc and how they are > dealt with between networks, and their foreseeable threat to the > infrastructure itself is relevant to the following the the charter: > > "# Discuss specific implementation issues which require cooperation and > coordination among network service providers to ensure the stability of > overall service to the network users. > # Serve as a focal point for other common activities of the participants. > # Promote and coordinate interconnection of networks within North > America and to other continents." - Jared -- Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from [email protected] clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
|