|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: mfnx
And just to be totally fair so that mfnx isn't misrepresented or anything. I've looked back and it doesn't seem like I got an autoresponded ticket and while calling the voice lines I got a fast busy which after some digging was a result of some voice issues on my carrier. So although it seemed to me that mfnx wasn't responding they might not have known they had to. I only had the toll free number, maybe a direct number would have worked but either way once posting to nanog the responses were very very quick and correct the first time. and most importantly, thanks to the folks who did help. Scott On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Leo Bicknell wrote: > In a message written on Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 10:02:24AM -0800, Scott Granados wrote: > > Nope, nobody responded from [email protected] so I tried here, got a response > > and was all set. Helpful once you get around the noc where we had no > > response. > > This is not in response to Scott's specific problem, but since MFN > was brought up I will inform a bit about how we work. > > [email protected] opens a ticket. You should get an auto reply within a couple > of minutes. No auto-reply probably means things are broken enough > that the phone is necessary. The phone number in the above.net, > mfnx.net, and AS 6461 records will (after a bit of IVR) get you to > someone who can help. > > [email protected] also opens a ticket. The same applies. > > Note, for us [email protected] and [email protected] go two different places. [email protected] is > realtime issues, [email protected] is policy/requests and other non-realtime > issues. > > -- > Leo Bicknell - [email protected] - CCIE 3440 > PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/ > Read TMBG List - [email protected], www.tmbg.org >
|