|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: Remote email access
Don't even need that. I can telnet into the appropriate server/port from a command prompt but, like your solution below, that is not non-geek friendly. We need a solution that is AOL user friendly, not NANOG user friendly if we ever expect to make money with this thing called the Internet. This will always be tragedy-of-the-commons; the very things that make service attractive for Joe PayingCustomer also make it easy for Joe Spammer/Hax0r. Open<->Secure, choose your business plan carefully. Good Luck. Best regards, ______________________________ Al Rowland > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of David Lesher > Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 10:06 AM > To: nanog list > Subject: Re: Remote email access > > > > Unnamed Administration sources reported that Al Rowland said: > > > > > > Only convenient kludge that is (mostly) provider independent is a > > webmail service, a completely different can of worms/flame war. > > Or a shell account at Panix, reached via SSH. > > $100.00/year is worth it to me; YMMV. > > > > > -- > A host is a host from coast to [email protected] > & no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) > 56-LINUX Unless the host (that isn't > close).........................pob 1433 is busy, hung or > dead....................................20915-1433 >
|