North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Sprint VS. Qwest
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 12:18:47PM -0500, dgold wrote: > > Both Sprint and Qwest are, most would agree, transit-free, "tier 1" > networks. They interconnect with all other similarly large networks. How > much more do you want? The size of their interconnections to 701? I'm not > sure how that is useful. http://west-boot.mfnx.net/traffic/sjc/sjc-sprint-oc3.html http://west-boot.mfnx.net/traffic/iad/iad-sprint-oc3.html http://west-boot.mfnx.net/traffic/chi/chi-sprint.html http://west-boot.mfnx.net/traffic/nyc/nyc-sprint.html http://west-boot.mfnx.net/traffic/lax/lax-sprint.html 'cause yeah, no "tier 1" has ever run congested to another, right? -- Richard A Steenbergen <[email protected]> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras PGP Key ID: 0x138EA177 (67 29 D7 BC E8 18 3E DA B2 46 B3 D8 14 36 FE B6)
|