North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: IP address fee??
On Fri, 06 Sep 2002 14:42:39 +0200, Peter van Dijk <[email protected]> said: > That is a common misconception. Recursing resolvers couldn't care less > if they are written according to spec (unlike old BIND versions, for > example). Well... way back when (18 months or so)... On Thu, 01 Feb 2001 18:11:34 PST, Paul Vixie <[email protected]> said: > > [email protected] (Pim van Riezen) writes: > > > bogosity while updating 8.2.2-P7 to 8.2.3: > > > > (1) 8.2.3 Doesn't accept the "(" in the SOA string to be on the next line > > after the IN SOA. Our script-generated zonefiles, about 45000 of them, > > all had this. > > Neither do the relevant RFC's, or any other DNS implementation. Pre-8.2.3 > was simply _wrong_ to accept that syntax. If you want to be the *next* guy who gets bit for 45K zones when the *next* next release starts enforcing something that was illegal-but-worked-mostly, be my guest.... -- Valdis Kletnieks Computer Systems Senior Engineer Virginia Tech Attachment:
pgp00002.pgp
|