North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Praise to XO's Security/Abuse

  • From: JC Dill
  • Date: Fri Aug 30 20:28:46 2002


On 04:36 PM 8/30/02, John M. Brown wrote:
>
>
>Jason at XO's security/abuse staff. Very helpful chap

Indeed he is. Which is why I'm totally mystified about why rfc-ignorant insists that my domain doesn't have a working abuse address. I would privately email the admin at rfc-ignorant about this problem, but, well.... (see below)

jc

>From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <[email protected]>
>Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
>Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>Errors-To: <[email protected]>
>To: <[email protected]>
>Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure)
>X-UIDL: 59729
>
>The original message was received at Mon, 26 Aug 2002 16:53:15 -0400 (EDT)
>from adsl-208-201-244-240.sonic.net [208.201.244.240]
>
> ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
><[email protected]>
>
> ----- Transcript of session follows -----
>... while talking to narn.megacity.org.:
>>>> RCPT To:<[email protected]>
><<< 550 5.7.1 <[email protected]>... Message rejected because the
>connecting host (wellington.concentric.net) does not have abuse contact -
>see www.rfc-ignorant.org
>550 <[email protected]>... User unknown
>
> ----- Original message follows -----
>
>Return-Path: <[email protected]>
>Received: from Erwin.vo.cnchost.com (adsl-208-201-244-240.sonic.net
>[208.201.244.240])
> by wellington.cnchost.com
> id QAA27406; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 16:53:15 -0400 (EDT)
> [ConcentricHost SMTP Relay 1.14]
>Errors-To: <[email protected]>
>Message-Id: <[email protected]>
>X-Sender: lists%[email protected]
>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0
>Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 13:55:30 -0700
>To: [email protected]
>From: JC Dill <[email protected]>
>Subject: Fwd: Returned mail: User unknown
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>
>Can you explain why rfc-ignorant thinks my domain doesn't have a working
>abuse address?
>
>jc