|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: SPEWS?
Unnamed Administration sources reported that Sabri Berisha said: > > > > I'm curious; do folks take these guys serious? > > Any non-contactable blacklist should not be taken serious. Posting to a > public forum (ie usenet) to contact the maintainer of such is list is not > acceptable and I for one can not understand why any responsible site > administrator would use such a list. Has anyone here acknowledged why it is that SPEWS is like this? MAPS was easy to reach, easy to find; they got sued into submission time & again, by spammers with big money... SPEWS has yet to be sued, AFAIK. As as bonus, it's great fun to see a spamhaus show up and bleat about how virginal they are, and they made one little mistake, and it's fixed; can they PLEASE wear a white dress....? And then the replies appear with records of spam after spam, often still in progress, get posted in reply.... -- A host is a host from coast to [email protected] & no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433 is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433
|