North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Hi
> > Guilty for clue-impairment is a lot different than guilty of intent to > spread. As for clue-impairment, I think everyone here agrees that Cisco > should have this well filtered. If this was your intended statement, then > yes, agreed. It was the implication of malice that I think was > inappropriate, especially in a public forum. Well hang on a bit there.... shouldn't merit have this filtered as well? Agreed the person who opened the said SCR should have had a clue, but what about merit protecting its subscribers? At very least one would think they would be geared up to thwart the spread of such viruses. X-Virus-Scanned: by MailScan
|