North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

RE: Hi

  • From: measl
  • Date: Tue Dec 11 20:56:04 2001

On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Rowland, Alan  D wrote:

> One would hope a Cisco employee, or better yet, their employer would have
> enough clue to have whacked this mole 24 hours after it appeared let alone a
> week later. Guess not. Then perhaps guilty as charged?

Guilty for clue-impairment is a lot different than guilty of intent to
spread.  As for clue-impairment, I think everyone here agrees that Cisco
should have this well filtered.  If this was your intended statement, then
yes, agreed.  It was the implication of malice that I think was
inappropriate, especially in a public forum.

We [hopefully] return to our regularly scheduled... Hmmm.....

J.A. Terranson
[email protected]

If Governments really want us to behave like civilized human beings, they
should give serious consideration towards setting a better example:
Ruling by force, rather than consensus; the unrestrained application of
unjust laws (which the victim-populations were never allowed input on in
the first place); the State policy of justice only for the rich and 
elected; the intentional abuse and occassionally destruction of entire
populations merely to distract an already apathetic and numb electorate...
This type of demogoguery must surely wipe out the fascist United States
as surely as it wiped out the fascist Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.

The views expressed here are mine, and NOT those of my employers,
associates, or others.  Besides, if it *were* the opinion of all of
those people, I doubt there would be a problem to bitch about in the
first place...

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Hi ����[Queen Vamp]����
  • References: