|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: EXAMPLE: ### xxx Canada detected a penetration attempt from 209.123.x.229. Incident# xxxx
I think that Alex's point is that if you want to *really* have a secure network, you can't do it by sending out automated mails every time a stray packet hits your network. That's likely to cause way more annoyance than any good it could possibly do. A much more effective way of proceeding would be to have a person looking at each and every incident, deciding whether it merits a notice to the offending network, and then sending a personal, non-threatening mail. --Adam -- Adam McKenna <[email protected]> | GPG: 17A4 11F7 5E7E C2E7 08AA http://flounder.net/publickey.html | 38B0 05D0 8BF7 2C6D 110A
|