North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Tri-GigE or OC-48 For Milwaukee > Chicago Network
You already asked these questions in another fora and received your answers there. Please resist the cycle of multiple crosspostings. > > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > ------=_NextPart_000_0065_01C142ED.9D61F6D0 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Dear List: > > We are going to be offering 10/100/1000Mbps Ethernet Services to = > Milwaukee, WI. We are also opening a 15,000 Sq. Foot Carrier-Neutral = > Collocation Facility. In order to connect our clients to the public = > peering exchanges in Chicago do you think we should install multiple = > Cisco 12,000 series routers in multiple POPs in Downtown Chicago, and = > then transport all of the data back to the Milwaukee Datacenter via = > Gigabit Ethernet lines (and then connect those gigabit Ethernet lines = > into Cisco Switches at the Milwaukee Datacenter) or bring the data back = > on one redundant OC-48 and have a router in Milwaukee to break up the = > OC-48? > > Also, Juniper or Cisco for this situation? What would you go with? > ---------------------- > Nick Catalano > Chief Strategy Officer > Nozone, Inc > > Services from the next generation - Nozone, Inc > > ------=_NextPart_000_0065_01C142ED.9D61F6D0 > Content-Type: text/html; > charset="iso-8859-1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> > <HTML><HEAD> > <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = > charset=3Diso-8859-1"> > <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=3DGENERATOR> > <STYLE></STYLE> > </HEAD> > <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> > <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Dear List:</FONT></DIV> > <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> > <DIV><FONT size=3D2>We are going to be offering 10/100/1000Mbps Ethernet = > Services=20 > to Milwaukee, WI. We are also opening a 15,000 Sq. Foot Carrier-Neutral=20 > Collocation Facility. In order to connect our clients to the public = > peering=20 > exchanges in Chicago do you think we should install multiple Cisco = > 12,000 series=20 > routers in multiple POPs in Downtown Chicago, and then transport all of = > the data=20 > back to the Milwaukee Datacenter via Gigabit Ethernet lines (and then = > connect=20 > those gigabit Ethernet lines into Cisco Switches at the Milwaukee = > Datacenter) or=20 > bring the data back on one redundant OC-48 and have a router in = > Milwaukee to=20 > break up the OC-48?</FONT></DIV> > <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> > <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Also, Juniper or Cisco for this situation? What = > would you go=20 > with?</FONT></DIV> > <DIV><FONT size=3D2>----------------------<BR>Nick Catalano<BR>Chief = > Strategy=20 > Officer<BR>Nozone, Inc</FONT></DIV> > <DIV> </DIV> > <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Services from the next generation - Nozone,=20 > Inc</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML> > > ------=_NextPart_000_0065_01C142ED.9D61F6D0-- >
|