|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: When will 128M not be enough?
> > >[email protected] schrieb: > >> >> It looks like some recent aggregation has been helping to slow down the >> growth. Yes, us http://www.multicasttech.com/status/index.html (at ~ 102k), Telstra http://www.telstra.net/ops/bgp/index.html (at ~ 105k) and KPNQwest http://www.mcvax.org/~jhma/routing/bgp-hist.html (at ~ 103k) have had flat numbers of suffixes since about mid-June. IMHO it's way too soon to tell if this is really a new trend. Regards Marshall Eubanks >If you look at some figures (e.g. >http://www.employees.org/~tbates/cidr-report.html) it's even pretty stable >around 101K prefixes. > >128M should do if you only have two or three upstreams, soft reconfiguration >disabled and almost nothing else enabled. Does anyone have experience with >zebra/mrt/... as a route server?. I need one and would like to you for the >cheap server based solution instead of having to buy a fully fledged router. > >TIA > >-- Arnold > |