|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: AS Leakage
|+ Did I say I didn't believe it? I said I didn't realize he worked for |+ exodus. Had I known that, I wouldn't have suggested that if he filters |+ _701_ from his other connections, he would lose 701 connectivity in the |+ event that his 701 connection went down. Are we done trying to show off our regex skills? |+ There is nothing wrong on my side. We're not a direct peer of 701. I |+ never said I did. I do have paths into 701 however. You didn't specify |+ direct 701_13944. Maybe you the one who does not understand the English language very well. Let me show you the original question I asked: |$ So, you were under the belief that a rather large service |$ provider, only had one connection to UUNet? How many paths do you, |$ yourself have into UU? Are they anything > DS3? Your response: |+ As for paths into 701, we three. All of them > DS3. Caught in a lie, and trying to cover our ass now? Did not think people would remember what was posted, less than an hour ago? How stupid do you take us for? I think we can end this thread now. As you can see, you are just making yourself look worse, than you already do. -- darrin walton, [email protected]
|