|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: AS Leakage
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Darrin Walton wrote: > Do you honestly think, a company like Exodus would only have one > path to 701? Regardless of who said Exodus did, why would you not believe > it? Did I say I didn't believe it? I said I didn't realize he worked for exodus. Had I known that, I wouldn't have suggested that if he filters _701_ from his other connections, he would lose 701 connectivity in the event that his 701 connection went down. > > |+ As for paths into 701, we three. All of them > DS3. > > Quite funny, why do I not see 13944 behind 701? (I mean, I could > go 701 -> 6347 -> 13944, or 6259 -> 13944, but not 701 -> 13944). Is > something wrong on your side? There is nothing wrong on my side. We're not a direct peer of 701. I never said I did. I do have paths into 701 however. You didn't specify direct 701_13944. > |+ Have a nice day Darrin. > > having a great day, how about yourself? > > -- > darrin walton, [email protected] > --- John Fraizer EnterZone, Inc
|