North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Down under NANOG: Telstra problems and root servers
> On 21 Nov 2000, Sean Donelan wrote: > > > So, if a root server was placed in Australia, to whom's network should > > it be attached. Would OPTUS and Telstra cooperate and jointly provide > > connectivity and diversity? Or is the most connected place in the > > asia-pacific region still the west coast of the US? Depends. Japan & HongKong are pretty well connected and there are a number of other reasonably well connected places in SEA. And the past rule set seemed to call out for root servers to be placed "one hop off a public exchange" and run by a neutral party. Hence "M" is run by the Wide project off NSPIXP-n and "K" is run by RIPE off LINX. One might expect that -IF- a server was to become available and Oz was to actually acceed to hosting a server, that it would be one hop off an exchange, say WAIX or SYD-BONE and run by... say APNIC. In the past, Telstra has not been willing to host a root server. --bill
|