North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical RE: lame delegations
> RFC 1912, Sec 2.1: > > " Make sure your PTR and A records match. For every IP address, there > should be a matching PTR record in the in-addr.arpa domain. If a > host is multi-homed, (more than one IP address) make sure > that all IP > addresses have a corresponding PTR record (not just the first one). > Failure to have matching PTR and A records can cause loss > of Internet > services similar to not being registered in the DNS at all. Also, > PTR records must point back to a valid A record, not a > alias defined > by a CNAME. It is highly recommended that you use some software > which automates this checking, or generate your DNS data from a > database which automatically creates consistent data." > > I have yet to hear a convincing argument why this RFC should be > ignored. I have seen many problems when this is ignored. What about when you're setting up ARPA entries referring to CIDR allocations? as in ... 1.8.5.10.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN CNAME 1.0/24.8.5.10.in-addr.arpa. Somethings got to give there. I know that you could say well, just put the hostname instead of the target listed above, but the above is often used to delegate ARPA for subnets to downstreams... Karyn > > RGDS > GARY > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ------------- > Gary E. Miller Rellim 20340 Empire Ave, Suite E-3, Bend, OR 97701 > [email protected] Tel:+1(541)382-8588 Fax: +1(541)382-8676 > > >
|