North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: UBR at MAE-East ATM, anyone?
Read on, Oh wise one. "Lauren F. Nowlin" wrote: > > Thanks for your update Steve and to Alex for getting the ball rolling. > > ONYX would also like to see this change implemented. > > The model the AADS team uses is far superior to any other scheme to > 'monitor' interactions between peers at the PVC level. Hands-off full mesh > build is the easiest to activate rapidly without botched PVCs trickling in > one-by-one or stuck in a random queue of a departed employee.. In a large corporation, individualistic details can get lost in the broad scope of things. Rate Cap'ing is wonderful thing, IMHO, as long as you have -adequate- resources to respond to the individual granularity of the dynamics of the -real- flows. Ahhh... Therein lies the caveat, eh ? :\ The best laid plans of mice and men...... > The > PeerMaker method is too human intensive for little to no gain from an > operational sense. A negative if you can't use the capacity for fear of > artificial caps being exceeded with other peers, which is the case noted > below. Great minds..... :) > > Also, I've never understood why PBNAP PVC build requests between two > customers - approved by both customers - have to be sent to PacBell > Marketing for approval... > Didn't they, in the old days, need to clear "tarriffing rules" out there ? Dereg was young....and some states had differing (read complex) regs. I know we had a - mess - with it.... Just my .02 Richard