North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical
Re: Alternative to BGP-4 for multihoming?
"Peter A. van Oene" wrote: > > Essentially, the 3DNS box assumes the DNS entry for the site for which the > customer requires multihoming and it intelligently balances traffic amongst > any geographically disparate sites. This allows for high availability. If I'm not mistaken, it accomplishes this in a somewhat obtrusive manner. The box attempts an xfer back to TCP/53 on the querying DNS server. Based on response time, a proper route is chosen. I've seen a lot of posts to Intrusion & GIAC from people who assumed someone was trying enumeration in preparation for an attack, only to find out it was one of these boxes. I also seem to remember a post on GIAC showing Snort traces of one of these boxes actually performing a full xfer if the box was not locked down. Do you use one of these boxes? If so, any idea what happens to the xfer data? Ignoring the argument as to whether its appropriate to attempt xfers on unsuspecting networks, I also see this as being pretty inefficient. A good quantity of sites are now running split DNS so the querying server is not even reachable. This means a fair percentage of the time the load balance attempt will outright fail. Don't see this replacing BGP anytime soon. ;) Chris -- ************************************** [email protected] * Multiprotocol Network Design & Troubleshooting http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0782120822/geekspeaknet * Mastering Network Security http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0782123430/geekspeaknet