|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: NANOG applicability (was: RE: )
On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 09:16:05AM -0700, dave o'leary wrote: > > At 05:45 AM 9/22/99 -0700, Derek Balling wrote: > > >So now, even the age-old "litmus test" of "how do I program my Cisco to do > >that?" is a bad one? > > Actually, in the case of service providers, this is exactly why the > "[email protected]" was established. Well, it wasn't really > established at that site, but that's where it migrated later. The list > is available for discussion of cisco service provider specific discussions > just like this one. If you want to talk about Juniper routers, on the > other hand.... :-) :-) > dave dave, i believe [email protected] already exists. > >At 01:09 AM 9/22/99 -0700, Mike Leber wrote: > > > > > >>Don't mean to be rude, these questions would be more appropriate for > >>inet-access, et al. Most people on this list are national or > >>international backbone operators. Appropriate topics concern operating > >>backbones. > >> > >>On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, Roeland M.J. Meyer wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > I'm looking similarly, but T1/PRI for dial-in support and a T3 to the > >> > Internet. > >> > Got Cisco 6509 on the Internet side and Ascend MAX 6000 on the WAN side. > >> > Bothe managed by Checkpoint, on a Sun Ultra5. > >> > > >> > > -----Original Message----- > >> > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of > >> > > Gerry McDonald > >> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 1999 9:13 AM > >> > > To: [email protected] > >> > > Subject: > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > I have a question... I am currently expanding our network to > >> > > accommodate a T1 to the > >> > > Internet and a 512K frame connection to our WAN.. I need to > >> > > purchase a router and spoke > >> > > to several vendors. I have heard conflicting stories > >> > > regarding the model of Cisco router I > >> > > should get. > >> > > > >> > > One vendor <vendor a> tells me that I should get a 2620 with > >> > > 2 Wan Ports and the other > >> > > vendor <vendor b> is telling me that I might compromise my > >> > > security by using one router for > >> > > WAN and Internet connections. Their suggesting that I get 2 > >> > > routers one for my Wan and > >> > > another for the Internet connection... > >> > > > >> > > Vendor B is telling me that it would be possible to enter our > >> > > wan without touching our firewall > >> > > should someone be able to hack into our IOS on the router... > >> > > > >> > > I decided to go the experts... I would appreciate any helpful > >> > > suggestions. > >> > > > >> > > Thanks... > >> > > > >> > > -Gerry > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >>+------------------- H U R R I C A N E - E L E C T R I C -------------------+ > >>| Mike Leber Direct Internet Connections Voice 408 282 1540 | > >>| Hurricane Electric Web Hosting Colocation Fax 408 971 3340 | > >>| [email protected] http://www.he.net | > >>+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+ > > > > >
|