North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Warning: OT [Was Re: Warning to ISPs: 9netave]
I do believe in this case the Digital Millenium Copyright Act was violated, and it's a stiff sumbitch when it comes to penalties, especially ones involving personal gain. I'd be more worried about the blatant attempt at credit fraud if I were the person behind it though. -- Joseph W. Shaw - [email protected] Freelance Computer Security Consultant and Perl Programmer Free UNIX advocate - "I hack, therefore I am." On Thu, 2 Sep 1999, Peter Galbavy wrote: > On Thu, Sep 02, 1999 at 02:15:50AM -0500, Phil Howard wrote: > > So 9netave has no AUP prohibiting use of its services for conducting scams? > > I would not want to run my web site at a hoster that could become blocked by > > many ISPs. But then, I'd never use 9netave for many reasons. > > I dunno. I just made the point. Check their web site for their AUPs > and if they are breached, follow the instructions they give. Remember > however that the AUP is an agreement between the provider and customer > and does not give a third party any rights (unless it is badly > written). That is what the courts are for. > > -- > Peter Galbavy > Knowledge Matters Ltd > http://www.knowledge.com/
|