|
North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: GTEI/Exodus
last i checked www.spicegirls.com wasn't on the exodus network. i think it's on netkonect.net whitehouse.com is on exodus though... ;) as per the contractual issues, all they told lowly engineers like myself was that we could disclose publicly the fact: 1. we have reached a solution with GTEi 2. it includes expanding ds3's with them 3. we're not buying transit or paying for peering 4. we're like friends and stuff now... ;) i'm sure when bowman gets up, he'll have something to say. he probably has a LOT more insight into #3 -dhiraj sr. systems engineer, exodus communications On Tue, 15 Sep 1998, Adam Rothschild wrote: > > > Hmm.. not to start another massive thread here, but I wonder if this means > > > that Exodus is now paying for transit and/or peering? > > > > Disclosure of this information is probally violation of > > the agreement, so unless you work for one of them, or know > > someone who does, you won't find out. > > Indeed. Point well taken. > > Still, I have a funny feeling that GTEI/BBN is being compensated royally > for this. This would have never happened otherwise, methinks. > > I doubt Mr. Curran is doing this simply to allow himself and his customers > to continue accesssing quality Exodus-hosted content, such as the Spice > Girls and whitehouse.com. Then again, I could be mistaken! :-) > >
|