North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
On Tue, Oct 28, 1997 at 11:15:24AM -0800, J.D. Falk wrote: > On Oct 28, Daniel Karrenberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > Some of them are esentially centralsied methods of controlling Internet > > content. Paul's anti-spam feed for instance prevents users of some > > providers from seeing spam. The user has no choice; they cannot opt to > > receive spam other than by switching to another provider. Even worse: > > they may not even be aware that they are "missing" some content. > > Users should be aware if their ISP is blocking something, > no matter what it is. However, that's not a technical or > operational issue...I'm not sure what category it is. It's a truth-in-advertising issue, J.D. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth [email protected] Member of the Technical Staff Unsolicited Commercial Emailers Sued The Suncoast Freenet "Pedantry. It's not just a job, it's an Tampa Bay, Florida adventure." -- someone on AFU +1 813 790 7592
|