North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: New Root Name Servers
This slipped through my procmail filter. I've fixed the filter, but I also choose to waste my time answering it. Note that I have set the reply-to to the [email protected] list. > The people on the NANOG list seem to have missed > much of the action for the past few months. I am not > sure that can be quickly solved. The people on the NANOG list have more important things to worry about. > TRUE Root Name Servers are Root Name Servers > that do not also do double-duty as TLD Name Servers. > The AlterNIC, Root 64, Root 128 and other movements > pioneered the notion of TRUE Root Name Servers. The > IANA and Network Solutions, Inc. are trying to play > catch up. I beg to differ. Two years before you knew what DNS stood for, I met with representatives of the IANA and of Network Solutions and described the problem. We have worked diligently from then 'til now to bring about some "."-only name servers, and it has required code changes in BIND to make it work without sending misshapen responses. I guess, Jim, that you just aren't in the loop. (I can't imagine why not.) I can't go on. The rest of the message I quoted above is just too bizarre. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|