North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: The SWAMP

  • From: Havard.Eidnes
  • Date: Mon Sep 09 07:27:39 1996 
> Isn't the argument of the non-default routing tables growing by an
> additional 13 entries or not is specious noise? The routing bucket is
> leaking through bloody great open chasms and we are wondering about
> the incremental damage throuigh a pinhole!

The 13 additional entries are not the issue.  The issue is one of
setting a bad high-profile example.

Any suggestions for closing the open chasms in the routing
bucket?

- Havard
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -