North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Comments

  • From: Gordon Cook
  • Date: Wed Sep 07 10:56:23 1994

Would you clarify this please Steve.  I thought peering had a $ price tag 
attached to it.  But NSF surely can't say that MCI must peer with COOKnet 
because MCI might say they want $2000 a month to do so and I might say I 
can nott afford such an "outrageous" price.  Are you saying that MCI or 
XYZ must peer with everyone where peer is defined as accepting traffic 
for R&E destinations at no cost?

To say that peering MUST take place and then leaving the cost of such 
peering to be negotiated seems of dubious workability.Gordon Cook, Editor 
COOK Report on Internet -> NREN 431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ  08618 USA
NEW E-mail: [email protected]
Subscriptions: $500 corporate site license; $175 edu.,non-profit & small corp.
$85 Individual

On Wed, 7 Sep 1994, Stephen Wolff wrote:

> > So long as ALL NSPs agree to peer at MAE-East then things should be OK, as no
> > transit is needed because all the regionals are connected by their individual
> > service provider. However there is no REQUIREMENT to peer. I am looking for
> > NSF to make this a requirement (at least for a year or so) to ensure continued
> > ubiquitous connectivity.
> It **IS** a requirement of NSF - if you connect to any NAP, but not if 
> you connect to MAE-East, the CIX, the GIX, the SWAB or the Dundalk 
> Consolidated International Three Hundred Baud Interconnect (local reference).
> The NSF-sponsored NAPs are the only places where we have the right to 
> shape policy.
> -s
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -