North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: Comments
I thought you were serious. Because I agree that most of the big advertisers and content people are in fact considering building their own networks. Marty > > Whoa!! Sarcasm is so hard these days. The attached list of 10 is > fiction. Pure and Simple. It was ment to point out that the players > on the NAPS will change over time and that my PERSONAL impression > is that the big-boys with Madison Ave backing (obscure US specific > reference for advertizing folks) will bury the existing commercial > players in the next few years. > This is only after I have been off my chocolete ration for too long > and I am depressed. > > > > > I am very glad to see it. Dumb me, no one ever posted it to the other > > lists and I think its important, > > > > Thanks, > > > > Joseph Stroup > > > > On Wed, 31 Aug 1994 [email protected] wrote: > > > > > > > > 01- RealTimeRUs Net > > > 02- BlockbusterNet > > > 03- GameNet > > > 04- 1900 > > > 05- MJ/PP music&videos > > > 06- TPCinc > > > 07- NBC > > > 08- EDS/RJR > > > 09- Sprint > > > 10- MCI > > > > > > Everyone else is next tier as a reseller or vertical niche player. > > > Or did you not want the 5 year view? > > > > > > --bill > > > > > > > > > > -- > --bill - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
|