|
You are hereHome » NANOG Meeting Presentation Abstract
|
|
NANOG Meeting Presentation Abstract
Community Meeting III | Meeting: | NANOG34 | |
Date / Time: | 2005-05-17 2:30pm - 5:00pm | |
Room: | Cascade II<BR>Mezzanine Level | |
Presenters: | Speakers: Betty Burke, Merit Network.Marcia Mardis, Merit Network.Steve Feldman, CNET.Martin Hannigan, VeriSign. | |
Abstract: | Tuesday afternoon and evening: Community Dialog
On Tuesday afternoon we\'ll work together to resolve open issues remaining from Sunday evening. By Tuesday evening, we\'ll be ready to prepare an action plan for next steps to take in the continuing evolution of NANOG.
Steve Gibbard\'s notes from Tuesday\'s meeting From: Steve Gibbard Subject: Notes from today\'s NANOG \"community meeting\"
Merit had many hours scheduled for discussions on the future of NANOG today. After less than 45 minutes, we agreed to all \"declare victory and enjoy a beautiful afternoon.\"
Mike McPherson, Merit\'s President, presented Merit\'s draft of the NANOG bylaw proposal. Merit\'s draft is quite similar to my version of the NANOG Reform bylaw proposal presented on these lists a few weeks ago, being the same word for word in some places with some differences in others.
Merit invited Steve Feldman, the program committee chair, and Marty Hannigan, who they had somehow decided was a representative of the NANOG Reform group, to comment on it. Steve said the program committee was willing to accept the proposal and that he was glad Merit was now thinking about what NANOG should be. Marty disclaimed representation of the NANOG Reform group (rightly -- he wasn\'t part of the NANOG Reform proposals), but said he agreed with Merit\'s proposal too.
As the most recent editor of the NANOG Reform bylaws, I thanked Merit for their proposal, and said I thought it was an improvement over by own.
Various others expressed support for the Merit proposal.
Mitchell Rose expressed a concern that the summary of the Merit proposal on the slides referenced NANOG as an organization for Internet service providers, and appeared to be excluding other large network operators. Merit agreed that this could be changed, but it appears that was wording only in the Powerpoint summary and not in their actual draft.
Vijay Gill said we\'re all crazy and should just go back to how things were. Nobody seemed willing to publicly agree with him.
Daniel Karrenberg suggested that since we all seemed to be agreeing with each other, we should \"declare victory and go home.\" There seemed to be general agreement with that.
So, it looks like we\'ll end up with the Merit draft or something pretty close to that, which I think is the right outcome. We should have \"steering committee\" elections sometime this summer, with the committee in place in time for the fall NANOG. I told Susan Harris that I\'d be happy to help with wording as they finalize it. She seemed receptive to that idea.
-Steve | |
Files: | Community Meeting III
| |
Sponsors: | None. | |
Back to NANOG34 agenda. NANOG34 Abstracts- BGP Analysis Tools
Speakers: Lixia ZhangUCLA; .Mohit LadUCLA; .Dan MasseyColorado State University; .Manish KarirMerit Network; .
- BGP Analysis Tools
Speakers: Lixia ZhangUCLA; .Mohit LadUCLA; .Dan MasseyColorado State University; .Manish KarirMerit Network; .
- BGP Analysis Tools
Speakers: Lixia ZhangUCLA; .Mohit LadUCLA; .Dan MasseyColorado State University; .Manish KarirMerit Network; .
- BGP Analysis Tools
Speakers: Lixia ZhangUCLA; .Mohit LadUCLA; .Dan MasseyColorado State University; .Manish KarirMerit Network; .
- Panel: XSP Security Vulnerabilities Panel
Moderators: Martin HanniganVersign; .Panelists: Patrick GilmoreAkamai Technologies; .Aaron HughesTerremark/NOTA; .Chris MalayterTDS Telecom; .Chris MorrowUUNET; .Richard SteenbergennLayer Communications; .
- Panel: XSP Security Vulnerabilities Panel
Moderators: Martin HanniganVersign; .Panelists: Patrick GilmoreAkamai Technologies; .Aaron HughesTerremark/NOTA; .Chris MalayterTDS Telecom; .Chris MorrowUUNET; .Richard SteenbergennLayer Communications; .
- Panel: XSP Security Vulnerabilities Panel
Moderators: Martin HanniganVersign; .Panelists: Patrick GilmoreAkamai Technologies; .Aaron HughesTerremark/NOTA; .Chris MalayterTDS Telecom; .Chris MorrowUUNET; .Richard SteenbergennLayer Communications; .
- Panel: XSP Security Vulnerabilities Panel
Moderators: Martin HanniganVersign; .Panelists: Patrick GilmoreAkamai Technologies; .Aaron HughesTerremark/NOTA; .Chris MalayterTDS Telecom; .Chris MorrowUUNET; .Richard SteenbergennLayer Communications; .
- Panel: XSP Security Vulnerabilities Panel
Moderators: Martin HanniganVersign; .Panelists: Patrick GilmoreAkamai Technologies; .Aaron HughesTerremark/NOTA; .Chris MalayterTDS Telecom; .Chris MorrowUUNET; .Richard SteenbergennLayer Communications; .
- Panel: XSP Security Vulnerabilities Panel
Moderators: Martin HanniganVersign; .Panelists: Patrick GilmoreAkamai Technologies; .Aaron HughesTerremark/NOTA; .Chris MalayterTDS Telecom; .Chris MorrowUUNET; .Richard SteenbergennLayer Communications; .
- Community Meeting III
Speakers: Betty BurkeMerit Network; .Marcia MardisMerit Network; .Steve FeldmanCNET; .Martin HanniganVeriSign; .
- Community Meeting III
Speakers: Betty BurkeMerit Network; .Marcia MardisMerit Network; .Steve FeldmanCNET; .Martin HanniganVeriSign; .
- Community Meeting III
Speakers: Betty BurkeMerit Network; .Marcia MardisMerit Network; .Steve FeldmanCNET; .Martin HanniganVeriSign; .
- Community Meeting III
Speakers: Betty BurkeMerit Network; .Marcia MardisMerit Network; .Steve FeldmanCNET; .Martin HanniganVeriSign; .
|
|