Re: e300 vs mx240 for border router ?

• From: Suresh Ramasubramanian
• Date: Mon Dec 15 11:53:50 2008

• List-archive: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: North American Network Operators Group <nanog.nanog.org>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>

On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:13 PM, Eugeniu Patrascu <[email protected]> wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
>>
>> Have you tried 3Com's 6040 / MSR-50 routers?
>
> No offense / no flame, but really, do you actually compare 3Com with Juniper
> ?

Patriotism :)


-- 
Suresh Ramasubramanian ([email protected])

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: e300 vs mx240 for border router ? Jerome Benoit

• References:
  • Re: e300 vs mx240 for border router ? Ubaidali_Abdul_Razack
  • Re: e300 vs mx240 for border router ? Eugeniu Patrascu

• Prev by Date: Re: e300 vs mx240 for border router ?
• Next by Date: Re: Net Mgmt Tools and supporting OS
• Date Index
• Thread Index
• Author Index
• Historical