North American Network Operators Group Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical Re: an over-the-top data center
On Dec 1, 2008, at 4:58 AM, Måns Nilsson wrote: --On söndag, söndag 30 nov 2008 23.05.01 -0500 "Patrick W. Gilmore" <[email protected]> wrote: In Sweden, the reason to not choose NetNod (and to go with the smaller I don't think any IXP can become a significant player on the Internet today by only attracting participants from the country in question. The Internet is not bound by political borders. (Usually. :) Now compare that to forcing every single participant to use unknown fiber I'm glad to hear the fibers seem to be stable. Past performance is no guarantee of future profits and all that, but it is good to know care has been taken in the past. As for the blasting of tunnels and national security angle, this is an IXP, not nuclear missile launch control. It should not be your only vector to get bits from point A to B. And if it is, then you have a larger problem than worrying about the facility withstanding physical attack. And no, attaching to multiple NetNod nodes is not a solution, since only Stockholm has a large number of participants. End of day, an IXP is not some magical thing. It is an ethernet switch allowing multiple networks to exchange traffic more easily than direct interconnection - and that is all it should be. It should not be mission critical. Treating it as such raises the cost, and therefore barrier to entry, which lowers its value. -- TTFN, patrick
|